Public example · synthetic documents
One comparison table, with the evidence left in view.
This page is a fictional example of the output shape. The products, values, filenames, and locations are invented and must not be used as manufacturer data.
Inputs in this example
Three fictional supplier documents describe similar equipment. One value appears in a PDF, one in an XLSX sheet, and one in a DOCX table. The comparison maps different labels to the canonical fields electrical.rated_input_power and physical.net_mass.
supplier-a.pdf· page 3 and page 4supplier-b.xlsx· Sheet 1supplier-c.docx· table 2 and paragraph 8
Comparison result
| Canonical field | Supplier A | Supplier B | Supplier C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rated input power | Supported 1,500 W supplier-a.pdf · p. 3 | Conflict 1,400 / 1,600 W supplier-b.xlsx · Sheet 1 | Unsupported No verified value supplier-c.docx · table 2 |
| Net mass | Supported 4.2 kg supplier-a.pdf · p. 4 | Missing Not mentioned No candidate found | Supported 4.5 kg supplier-c.docx · paragraph 8 |
Evidence record
Rated input power: 1.5 kW
The unit is normalized to 1,500 W using the allowed unit conversion. The quote remains available beside the normalized value.
Reviewer action
Supplier B stays in Conflict because the two values are incompatible under the same condition. A reviewer can inspect both candidates and choose one without erasing the original disagreement.
What this example does not prove
- It does not prove that any supplier value is technically true.
- It does not measure production accuracy or recall.
- It does not show OCR, URL crawling, formula execution, or manufacturer certification.